Archive for July, 2008

Bunny love

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

“Our nine year old daughter is pestering us for a pet. We cannot give time to a dog, should we get her a rabbit?”

CAROL SMILLIE:-

I think it’s a great idea to get a pet for your daughter as it will give her a sense of responsibility and a friend in the house. It’s also good that you are aware of the responsibility of owning a pet. Ninety per cent of children will nag for a pet but few will make good on all the promises. Robbie, my son, had a guinea-pig, Georgie, when he was about 8. We asked a neighbour to look after it when we went away on holiday and it took him the best part of a week to notice that the guinea-pig wasn’t there when we got back. So you need to be realistic and to be prepared to take on the animal if your child gets bored.

Your nine-year-old needs a tactile animal, one that she can play and interact with. Guinea-pigs and rabbits are good fun: awake during the day and happy to be handled – although you must make sure that they are picked up and stroked often. They are also portable and their cages are easy to clean out. Rabbits can also live indoors as they can be house-trained, like a cat. If you choose a hamster or a rat, don’t keep it in your child’s room. They scatter sawdust everywhere and they can become quite whiffy.

Last, if you have never had an pet before, you must check that your daughter isn’t allergic to animals. You will need to expose her to various pets in other people’s houses.

Christie, my eldest daughter, has to wash her hands every time she touches a guinea-pig or rabbit or she comes out in a rash. Once you’ve established that your child is OK, make sure that you buy a pet from a good breeder who has children. That will mean that the animal will be used to being handled by young people.

EMMA MAGNUS:-

The Animal Welfare Act 2007 makes it an offence for a child under 16 to buy a pet, so it is good that you are considering how much time you have, rather than your daughter’s time constraints, as all responsibility will come down to you. Rabbits are the third most common pet in the UK and seem like a good option for younger children who can’t walk a dog alone or may not be able to cope with the attention it needs.

However, a rabbit can live for between five and ten years, by which time your daughter will be 16. Will she still be interested then? Also, unless you let your rabbit in the home as a house pet, it should be kept in a pair or with a guinea-pig, as they are very social animals. Unfortunately, most live alone at the end of the garden in a small hutch, cared for by begrudging parents. Many are rehomed – or put to sleep. The Rabbit Welfare Association and the RSPCA say that more than 10,000 rabbits are brought into rescue centres each year.

Rats can get a terrible press, but they are amazingly interactive as a pet. They learn quickly, are rarely aggressive and, unlike rabbits which, as a prey animal are prone to panic, they can be handled easily. They usually live for two years so are an ideal first pet and can be replaced cheaply. Unlike hamsters they are also awake when we are, so that you’re more likely to see it, and its nibbling and activity won’t disturb your sleep.

To test your daughter’s commitment to pet-keeping, why not get her to offer to pet-sit for your neighbours? If she reacts well to the daily chores, I would say go ahead with an animal that has a short life span. If she proves that she is more than capable of caring for an animal, you could move on to bigger pets as she grows up and is able to take on more responsibility.

Click Here! For the full story and video clip

Snakes suffering from rat shortage

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

There might be more rats than people in the UK but there are fears reptile owners are facing a crisis because there are not enough to feed their pets – such is the demand.

John Regan, 58, an HGV driver from Derby Street, off Heigham Street in Norwich, who owns about 40 snakes, aged from one to 13, said he is concerned about the shortage which means food for reptiles has had to be imported in from continental Europe.

He said: “There is a crisis for keepers of reptiles in Norwich. I have kept reptiles for 13 years but this year it’s all gone to pot. In the past there’s always been an abundance of food.”

His eight-year-old Carolina corn snake, which only eats rats, has not been fed for several weeks, he said, and had lost half his bodyweight.

He said: “Normally I feed them once a week. They don’t feed over the mating season, so when it gets to this time, they have a hell of an appetite. They should be fed but the food’s not available.

“There must be many other reptile owners in the same position as me. I’m really worried what I’m going to do.

“The reptile business is in turmoil. I’ve been told that reptile food – rats and mice – has to be imported from Europe, but that rats are no longer available because the USA is buying all the rats from Europe.

“But I cannot understand why the food cannot be produced in our country or somewhere else.”

Paul Skinner, the owner of Norwich Reptile Company in City View Road, Hellesdon, admitted there was a shortage of specific sizes in frozen rats and mice, but he said there was always an alternative.

He said: “There are people who produce reptile food in this country, but not the quantity that is required. That’s why it has to be imported from Europe. It also may have something to do with getter a better deal in Europe and it being cheaper.

“I have heard that a lot of European stocks are going to the States, but I don’t know if that’s true or not.”

A commercial source, who did not wish to be named, added: “I would not say the situation was that bad at the moment, and I’ve seen it worse.

“There’s always a shortage at some point for one reason or another, because these are obviously not manufactured items. Early in the year when a lot of babies are born, there’s a high demand for smaller food, so there’s less to go round.”

There are estimated to be more than 60m rats in the UK, about one for every person.

Click Here! For the full story

First UK-bred beavers for 400 years

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

Beavers have been born in Britain for first time in 400 years – on an exclusive housing development.

The 12 kits are flourishing at the 550-acre Lower Mill Estate near Cirencester, Gloucestershire – a sustainable luxury home complex designed by 30 of the world’s top architects.

Experts believed six beavers introduced there three years ago had bred in January, after noticing tell-tale signs. But no-one had seen the kits until now.

Lower Mill Estate owner Jeremy Paxton brought three pairs – called Tony and Cherie, Gordon and Sarah, John and Pauline – to Flagham Fen Lake in 2005. Beavers were hunted to extinction in the 16th century because their throat glands were thought to be medicinal.

Estate spokesman Alistair Bankier said: “We are very excited – these are European beavers and not as aggressive as their American counterparts. People who live around the estate began to see the kits so we asked a professional wildlife photographer to camp out to get proof.

“It is difficult to spot them – you need to be there between 4am and 6am to capture images of the beavers. If they see humans that’s it – they go back underwater. We’ve managed to get 20 minutes of footage. It shows the kits frolicking together with the mother beaver, swimming and dragging wood.

“Everyone is very proud that these kits have been born as conservation is part of the identity of the estate. There are over 6,000 protected wildlife species at Lower Mill and the beavers are just part of it.”

With price tags of up to £10 million, stars including Brad Pitt are thought to have expressed an interest in the modern Utopia, on the Cotswold Water Park. Orchid House, modelled on a Bee Orchid, recently sold for £7.2 million to a mystery buyer.

Developer Jeremy Paxton said: “Beaver kits can swim, but it may take them a month or more to figure out how to hold their breath and swim underwater. When they get tired, they catch a ride on their mother’s back. Lower Mill residents hope to witness all this activity and more, yards from human habitation.

“It’s an exciting development on an estate which, through careful management of hedges and woodland over many years, now serves as home to more than 13 classic English songbirds. It’s also one of the very few places in the country which provides a breeding habitat for the Lesser Emperor Dragonfly.”

Click Here! For the full story

Getting back to nature

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

We have known for a while that our cotton wool culture is helping to create a generation of children who prefer to entertain themselves with high-tech gadgetry. Now it seems that some children spend so little time outdoors they can’t tell the difference between a bee and a wasp. It’s time for a change, writes Susan Welsh who suggests this weekend is the one to re-introduce the family to the great outdoors.

HERE’S a scary statistic. Half of today’s children spend so little time outdoors that they can’t tell the difference between a bee and a wasp.

For an almost 50-something like myself, it’s almost impossible to believe.

One of the joys of my school holidays was taking a clean glass jar, adding a dollop of jam, then spending hours searching hedgerows and bushes for bumble bees to entice into the jar.

Youngsters quickly learned to tell the difference between a humble bumble and a short-tempered wasp.

No one knew why we collected bees, it was just one of the rites of summer, like catching minnows with a bandy net, chasing butterflies and going off for long cycle runs with the sound of your mum’s voice shouting ‘be back in time for tea’ ringing in your ears.

But attitudes have changed and bees and wasps aren’t the only wildlife alien to our stay-at-home youngsters.

A new survey by the National Trust found that one in three 10-12-year-olds can’t identify one of the UK’s most common birds, the magpie, or the distinctive red admiral butterfly.

However, nine out of 10 could correctly name Doctor Who’s arch enemies, the Daleks, and a similar number could identify Star Wars’ Jedi Grand Master, Yoda.

Such findings are hardly surprising when you bear in mind that only one in five of today’s children play outside in the street or local parks every day.

Yet this is despite the fact that studies have shown that 80% of children prefer playing outside, and 86% of parents say that on a nice day their children would prefer to go to the park than watch TV.

In a bid to harness this desire to get out and about, the National Trust has launched the Take A Fantastic Family Journey Into Space campaign, in a bid to encourage families to spend more time together outdoors.

A series of events, including bug hunts and safari trails, are being held at National Trust properties during the coming months as part of the campaign.

The National Trust for Scotland, along with Historic Scotland and local government ranger services, also arrange special days when youngsters can get back in touch with – or be introduced to – the joys of nature.

National Trust nature conservation adviser Matthew Oates said: “Natural beauty and wildlife are vital to us. The more distanced we become from nature, the more difficult it will be for us to survive on this planet.”

Experts say play, particularly when it’s outdoors, is crucial to a child’s health, and to them gaining vital experiences.

Psychologist Jane Prince says that much of the value of children getting outside is that they can learn about boundaries in addition to those set for them by their parents.

“Children need to go somewhere where they can test their boundaries. If kids play outside in an environment where they’re not controlled and which isn’t defined by the quality of the product, as it is when they’re playing indoors with toys, they can start to experiment and explore what they can do for themselves.”

Such exploration can lead to the development of new skills ranging from co-operation with other children, to balancing abilities and learning how to assess when water’s too deep and powerful.

Exploring the great outdoors with their families is a great way for children to learn. When they are outside, they look at things growing, they look at animals and flowers and plants, and touch things that don’t feel the way things in the house feel.

Jane added: “They also learn not to be frightened of nature and that a spider or a worm isn’t really that terrifying.

“They engage with their own planet, by running around open spaces and getting down and getting dirty.”

So this weekend, why not tear your children away from the TV or computer and take them out and about?

If parents want it to be a success then they need to show that they are enjoying the outing too – no point in trying to persuade kids it’s fun if mum and dad moan about the weather — what’s a bit of rain if it keeps your children happy and healthy?

And with a bit of luck, they might be able to tell the difference between a bee and a wasp by the end of the day. . .

Click Here! For the full story

CREDIT CRUNCH BRINGS UNWANTED PETS

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

Record numbers of pets are apparently being abandoned in the borough as a result of the credit crunch.

Animal rescue centres across North East Lincolnshire say they are struggling to cope with the influx of unwanted animals, as people feel the pinch.

Some animals have been left on the doorsteps of the sanctuaries, while others have even been discovered in empty homes because people apparently could not afford mortgage repayments or keep up with the rent.

A recent national report predicted repossessions will soar as the housing market becomes one of the biggest casualties of the global credit crunch.

Jeanette Vause, of Nine Lives Cat Rescue, in Killingholme, said an “explosion” of unwanted cats meant she was struggling to stay open.

She said: “I have been doing this for 20 years and I have never seen anything like it.

“I had 38 kittens just three weeks ago. Obviously people have tight budgets at the moment and this is why there are so many animals being left.

“They are not being fed and they are coming to me half-starved.

“We are getting so many pregnant kittens which are not even old enough to have kittens themselves, because they cannot afford to get them spayed.

“If we have many more months like this we will go under.”

Despite this, Jeanette said she sympathised with people being evicted.

She said: “A woman called from Barrow who had five kittens and several cats and was being repossessed the next day. She was sat there in tears.

“People who get evicted must feel desperate. It doesn?t necessarily mean they don?t love their cats.

“We had one lady drop her two cats off in a cardboard box outside our house. The note said ‘Sorry. Can’t keep them. Losing home’. I don’t know what will happen when we start turning them away.”

Click Here! For the full story

How much do we really love our pets?

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

New research has revealed that 91% of Brits say pets have a positive impact on children and over half believe pet owners are more responsible citizens. What’s more, seven out of ten surveyed believe that pet ownership makes you more intuitive to the needs of others, whilst almost two thirds (62%) say pet owners are more caring. And yet, additional research showed that, as a nation, we don’t give our faithful companions the due care and attention they deserve.

Research released by the National Office of Animal Health (NOAH) to mark the launch of the Pet Health Information website (www.pethealthinfo.org.uk), illustrates a shocking lack of awareness of pet health issues, such as worming and vaccination, amongst some pet owners.

Pet owners fall into two categories – those who are ‘preventers’ and those who are ‘non-preventers’. Whilst both camps agreed that responsible pet ownership equalled love and attention resulting in caring, feeding and exercising their pets, disease prevention was often not seen as part of this love with only 55% of dogs and 46% of cats over two years of age being vaccinated against potentially fatal diseases.

‘Preventers’ make a conscious effort to ensure their pet is protected from a wide range of problems with 96% regarding worming as a regular part of pet health care, whereas ‘non-preventers’ are more likely not to worm their pet because they see no reason to do so, with over a quarter (28%) not deeming it to be necessary.

Alarmingly, the research also showed that the two out of five owners who sleep with their pets – with the pet in the bedroom, on the bed, or even in the bed itself – despite their close proximity with their pets, are no more likely than other owners to practice preventative health care such as worming or flea control.

The latest research went on to illustrate the significant benefits and rewards of pet ownership with 78% quoting companionship as the most rewarding aspect in the survey undertaken by Opinion Matters1. Moreover, over half of people (58%) went on to admit that their pet cheers them up and just under a third (32%) revealed that their pet does wonders for their sense of humour.

Whilst the facts speak for themselves, many owners still firmly believe that they know all they need to know about pet health care and do not actively seek information.

Click Here! For the full story

CCTV for dog poo defended

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

A controversial senior policeman has defended the use of CCTV to target dog owners who allow their pets to foul the pavement.

Crime was so low that police could now afford to concentrate on petty crime, police chief Richard Brunstrom wrote on his blog.

The Chief Constable of North Wales, railed against civil liberties campaigners who question the encroachment of CCTV into daily life.

He also defended local authorities who use the terror-busting cameras to pick up dog foulers.

He said: ‘Our citizenry in the UK is very comfortable with today’s surveillance society; CCTV makes people (including me) feel safer.

‘Dog dirt does matter – because local residents say that it does. Traditional crime has become if not a rarity then certainly unusual. It is rather wonderful that we have nothing more frightening to talk about than dog fouling.’

Crime has dropped by 30 per cent in North Wales over the past five years and burglary is down by 60 per cent.

Outspoken Mr Brunstrom caused outrage in January when he called for hard drugs to be legalised. The Association of Chief Police Officers declined to comment on his latest observations.

Click Here! For the full story

DOGS MAY WELL BE THE PLANET’S BEST FRIEND REVEALS A STUDY FROM BUTCHER’S PET CARE

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

Dog-owning families have a lower carbon footprint than equivalent families without a dog. That’s the conclusion of a new nationwide survey and in-depth study commissioned by Butcher’s Pet Care. It found that dog-owning families on average, use 5.4% (760kg per year)[1] less carbon per person than the equivalent non-dog owning families – the yearly equivalent of a round trip to Cairo or Marrakesh. They are also happier in their local community and twice as likely to socialise with neighbours (16% as opposed to 8%).

The study polled over 1500 dog and non-dog owning families and questioned them about lifestyle choices, energy consumption, travel and transport habits. The respondents’ primary and secondary carbon footprints were then calculated. Results revealed that dog owning families fly, consume and waste less and are also more likely to buy local and recycle.

As two in ten homes own a dog[1] the entire population of man’s best friend reduces the nation’s carbon footprint by 3.4 million tonnes of CO2 every year, which is one and a half times the entire yearly output of Iceland!

Comments Alison Cockcroft, from family owned Butcher’s Pet Care “As a nation we are always looking at ways to reduce our carbon footprint and it is great to see that dog ownership can really make a difference and help boost green credentials. Not only do our four legged friends keep us as ‘Fit as a Butcher’s Dog’ but they also give us a great excuse to explore our neighbourhood and get to know and support our local community. At Butcher’s Pet Care we believe in natural nutrition so not only can your dog lead a healthy life but he’ll ensure the planet stays healthy too!”

The facts:

Flights
* Dog owning families are 20% less likely to fly than non-dog owning families. Preferring to holiday in the UK or drive to Europe instead.

Consumption and recycling
* The consumption and recycling habits of dog owners is 7.5% more carbon friendly than the equivalent non-dog owning family. This equates to a reduction of 150kg a year, the same as driving 568 miles in a 1.6L Ford Focus.

Dog owners are 1.4 times more likely to recycle everything (21% vs 15%) than non dog owners. 23% recycle or compost everything they use as opposed to 19% of families without a dog.

Dog owners are more likely to buy locally produced food, fair-trade produce and in-season fruit and vegetables.

19% of dog owners only buy things with little or no packaging as opposed to 14% of non dog owners.

Not only will dog-owners spend less on their gas bills (£403.71 as opposed to £414.26 for non-dog owners) but they also seem happier in their local community too – 24% of dog owners are very happy compared to 19% of non dog owners. Dog owners are also twice as likely to socialise with their neighbours compared to non dog owners.

For more top tips on leading a green life and responsible dog ownership visit www.butcherspetcare.com

Infomation Provided by The SPA Way